«MUTUAL ASSURED DESTRUCTION» (MAD)

«MUTUAL ASSURED DESTRUCTION» (MAD)

Authors

  • Umurbaev Rustam Shakirjanovich 4th-year student of Tashkent State University of Oriental Studies Tashkent city

Keywords:

particular conflict, Cold War, nuclear missiles, significant.

Abstract

The advent of nuclear weapons fundamentally changed warfare. During the United States and Soviet Union Cold War, both sides developed enough nuclear weapons to destroy each other multiple times over. Each side perceived the other to be a «sensible rational opponent» whose behavior was shaped by «threats of nuclear retaliation» from the other. Each relied upon the other to be concerned about its own survival and to not take an action that would lead to its own annihilation by nuclear retribution. While some secondary and proxy conflicts occurred, neither side could risk deploying a nuclear weapon because of the anticipated response. The «strategic bipolarity» model that defined the Cold War no longer represents the state of the world, in terms of physical conflict.

References

W. Curtis The assured vulnerability paradigm: can it provide a useful basis for deterrence in a world of strategic multi-polarity? 16 (3) (2000), pp. 239-256.

I. Salehyan The delegation of war to rebel organizations J. Confl. Resolut., 54 (3) (Jun. 2010), pp. 493-515.

V. Andre The janus face of new media propaganda: the case of Patani neojihadist YouTube warfare and its islamophobic effect on cyber-actors Islam Christ. Relations, 25 (3) (Jul. 2014), pp. 335-356.

J. Forest Perception challenges faced by Al-Qaeda on the battlefield of influence warfare on JSTOR Perspect. Terror., 6 (1) (2012), pp. 8-22.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-01
Loading...